Perpustakaan judul masih dalam tahap pengembangan, admin siap menampung kritik dan saran
The Ambiguity Of Genitive Of-Construction (A Study Of Semantics)
Yulie Indriani (2011) | Skripsi | Sastra Inggris
Bagikan
Ringkasan
Penelitian ini berjudul The Ambiguity of Genetive of-construction (Abr /br /br /
Study of Semantics), dilakukan berdasarkan asumsi bahwa genitive ofconstructionbr /br /br /
sulit untuk ditafsirkan. Hal ini menyebabkan ambiguitas. Olehbr /br /br /
karena itu, penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui makna apabr /br /br /
saja yang dapat ditafsirkan dari genitive of-construction, proposisi apa saja yangbr /br /br /
dapat dinyatakan dari genitive of-construction, dan implicit case dan state rolebr /br /br /
apa saja yang terdapat dalam genitive of-construction. Dalam penelitian ini, databr /br /br /
diambil dari beberapa sumber, yaitu Wuthering Heights, Northanger Abbey, Thebr /br /br /
Complete Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure of Huckleberry Finn, Sense andbr /br /br /
Sensibility, Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows, and The Prisoner of Azkaban.br /br /br /
Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptifbr /br /br /
analitik, dilakukan dengan cara menggambarkan dan menganalisis data. Metodebr /br /br /
deskriptif hanya difokuskan pada penggambaran ambiguitas genitive ofconstruction.br /br /br /
Sedangkan metode analitik difokuskan pada analisis strukturbr /br /br /
semantik yang mengindikasikan genitive of-construction yang ambigu.br /br /br /
Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah adanya 3 klasifikasi yang muncul;br /br /br /
pertama, Genitive of-construction yang menyatakan Event proposition ditandaibr /br /br /
oleh implicit Agent atau Action; ditandai oleh impllicit Agent atau Affceted;br /br /br /
ditandai oleh implicit Agent atau Action atau Beneficiary; ditandai oleh implicitbr /br /br /
Agent atau Beneficiary. Kedua, Genitive of-construction yang menyatakan Statebr /br /br /
atau Event Proposition ditandai oleh implicit Agent atau Action. Ketiga, Genitivebr /br /br /
of-construction yang menyatakan Event dan State Proposition ditandai olehbr /br /br /
implicit Agent atau Action; ditandai oleh implicit Agent atau Action ataubr /br /br /
Comment; ditandai oleh Agent atau Action atau Comment atau Beneficiary;br /br /br /
ditandai oleh implicit Agent atau Comment; ditandai oleh implicit Agent ataubr /br /br /
Affected atau Comment. Analisis membuktikan bahwa genitive of-constructionbr /br /br /
dapat menjadi ambigu karena ada beberapa case dan state role yang dihilangkan.br /br /br /
Selain itu, hal ini juga terjadi dalam sebuah kalimat karena tidak ada kata, frasabr /br /br /
ataupun klausa yang memberikan informasi tambahan mengenai genitive ofcontruction
Ringkasan Alternatif
The research entitled The Ambiguity of Genitive of-construction (Abr /br /br /
Study of Semantics) is conducted based on the assumption that the genitive ofconstructionbr /br /br /
is hard to interpret. Then, it causes the ambiguity. Thus, this researchbr /br /br /
is purposed to find out the meanings resulted from the ambiguity of genitive ofconstruction,br /br /br /
the propositions encoded from the ambiguity of genitive ofconstruction,br /br /br /
and the implicit case and state roles involved in the ambiguity ofbr /br /br /
genitive of-construction. In this research, the data were collected from several databr /br /br /
sources, such as Wuthering Heights, Northanger Abbey, The Complete Sherlockbr /br /br /
Holmes, Tom Sawyer Huckleberry Finn, Sense and Sensibility, Harry Potterbr /br /br /
and The Deathly Hallows, and Prisoner of Azkaban.br /br /br /
The method used in this research is analytic descriptive method, conductedbr /br /br /
by describing and analyzing the data. The descriptive method is focused on thebr /br /br /
description of ambiguity of genitive of-construction. Meanwhile, the analyticbr /br /br /
method is focused on the analysis of the semantic structure indicating thebr /br /br /
ambiguity of genitive of-construction.br /br /br /
As the result of the research, there were 3 classifications emerge; first,br /br /br /
Genitive of-constructions encode Event propositions which were marked bybr /br /br /
implicit Agent or Action; implicit Agent or Affected; implicit Agent or Action orbr /br /br /
Beneficiary; implicit Agent or Beneficiary. Second, Genitive of-constructionsbr /br /br /
encode State Propositions which were marked by implicit Agent or Action. Third,br /br /br /
Genitive of-constructions encode Event and State Propositions which werebr /br /br /
marked by implicit Agent or Action; implicit Agent or Action or Comment;br /br /br /
implicit Agent or Action or Comment or Beneficiary; implicit Agent or Comment;br /br /br /
implicit Agent or Affected or Comment. The analysis proved that the genitive ofconstructionbr /br /br /
could be ambiguous since there were some case and state roles whichbr /br /br /
were left implicit. In addition, it could also be ambiguous in sentence since therebr /br /br /
were no words, phrases, or clauses which gave more information about genitivebr /br /br /
of-construction