Perpustakaan judul masih dalam tahap pengembangan, admin siap menampung kritik dan saran
TINJAUAN HUKUM TENTANG PELELANGAN PEMILIHAN MITRA KERJA UNTUK PENGADAAN BARANG DAN/ATAU JASA MELALUI INTERNET DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PERATURAN PRESIDEN NOMOR 8 TAHUN 2006 TENTANG PERUBAHAN KEEMPAT ATAS KEPUTUSAN PRESIDEN NOMOR 80 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG PEDOMAN PELAKSANAAN PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH
VICKA SEPTRIYATI SUPRIADI (2007) | Skripsi | -
Bagikan
Ringkasan
Fastest information technology development was seemed in all of world, including selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. While selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet is making some facilities available, it is not meant a process without any complication. In practice, there were some cases in the selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. Such a condition seemed persistently expanded, leading to the issue of Presidential Regulations Number 8 Year 2006 on Fourth Change of Presidential Decree Number 80 Year 2003 on Guidelines for Public Product/Service Supply Performance. The regulations are intended to be guidelines in carrying out selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. The question how Presidential Regulations will be organizing selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet, possible obstacles to selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet, and legal actions against possible issues of selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet.
The research is analytical descriptive in nature using a normative juridical approach. The resulting data is put in juridical qualitatively analysis, it is possible to note hierarchies of regulation and legislation and to secure law for sure that the prevailing regulations are really enforced by ones who upholds the law.
Based on the research, it is seemed Presidential Regulations Number 8 Year 2006 on Fourth Change of Presidential Decree Number 80 Year 2003 on Guidelines for Implementation of Public Product/Service Supply have not specifically organize selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet, since Presidential Regulations Number 8 Year 2006 on Fourth Change of Presidential Decree Number 80 Year 2003 on Guidelines for Implementation of Public Product/Service Supply was not organizing selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. The incidence of some obstacles, for examples, limited appreciation by product/service providers in Internet application, corruption, collusion, and nepotism, particularly corruption among agents, are factors inhibiting selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet development. In addition, obstacles to selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet are resulting from the lack of explicit regulations that organize selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. Law actions against possible issues of selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet are performing open-minded, transparently auction or tender, control over product/service supply, and taking law actions, civil and criminal, or by means of State Administrative Judgment.
Ringkasan Alternatif
Fastest information technology development was seemed in all of world, including selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. While selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet is making some facilities available, it is not meant a process without any complication. In practice, there were some cases in the selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. Such a condition seemed persistently expanded, leading to the issue of Presidential Regulations Number 8 Year 2006 on Fourth Change of Presidential Decree Number 80 Year 2003 on Guidelines for Public Product/Service Supply Performance. The regulations are intended to be guidelines in carrying out selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. The question how Presidential Regulations will be organizing selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet, possible obstacles to selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet, and legal actions against possible issues of selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet.
The research is analytical descriptive in nature using a normative juridical approach. The resulting data is put in juridical qualitatively analysis, it is possible to note hierarchies of regulation and legislation and to secure law for sure that the prevailing regulations are really enforced by ones who upholds the law.
Based on the research, it is seemed Presidential Regulations Number 8 Year 2006 on Fourth Change of Presidential Decree Number 80 Year 2003 on Guidelines for Implementation of Public Product/Service Supply have not specifically organize selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet, since Presidential Regulations Number 8 Year 2006 on Fourth Change of Presidential Decree Number 80 Year 2003 on Guidelines for Implementation of Public Product/Service Supply was not organizing selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. The incidence of some obstacles, for examples, limited appreciation by product/service providers in Internet application, corruption, collusion, and nepotism, particularly corruption among agents, are factors inhibiting selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet development. In addition, obstacles to selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet are resulting from the lack of explicit regulations that organize selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet. Law actions against possible issues of selective business partner tender for product/service supply on Internet are performing open-minded, transparently auction or tender, control over product/service supply, and taking law actions, civil and criminal, or by means of State Administrative Judgment.