Perpustakaan judul masih dalam tahap pengembangan, admin siap menampung kritik dan saran
TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMALSUAN KARTU KREDIT (CREDIT CARD) DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PASAL 263 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP) JUCNTO PASAL 35 UNDANG-UNDNAG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (ITE)
YESI LELI K (2009) | Skripsi | -
Bagikan
Ringkasan
Globalization era is marked by the growing of information and transactional media, and the Indonesian banking system has followed world globalization, as the idea of credit card is giving client a practical and efficient transactions. Adjacent to the positive impacts, one of the credit cardâÃâ¬Ãâ¢s negative impacts is credit card counterfeiting. In Indonesian positive law, credit card counterfeiting has being regulated by article 263 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) about making a fake letter and falsify a letter, so therefore a query on how article 263 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) and article 35 Regulation No. 11/2008 about Information and Transactional Electronic (ITE) regulate credit card counterfeiting and the legal action that could be done to the criminal.
This research is using an analytical description with normative juridical approach. The data has been qualitative juridical analyzed considering the hierarchy of the regulations itself and to achieve law certainness as the government execute the regulation actually.
Based on the result of this research, credit card counterfeiting has fulfilled the objective and subjective substances of article 263 subsection 1 and 2 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) about making a fake letter and falsify a letter as in article 35 Regulation No. 11/2008 about Information and Transactional Electronic (ITE), consequently the criminal of this counterfeiting could be accused by article 263 subsection 1 and 2 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) juncto article 35 Regulation No. 11/2008 about Information and Transactional Electronic (ITE). However, a preventive and repressive action should be done for all law-breaking acts including credit card counterfeiting. Preventive way of action could be taken in 3 approaches consist of technological, cultural social, and legal approach. Repressive action by law enforcements (police, public prosecutor, judge) is taken considering to article 263 subsection 1 and 2 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) juncto article 35 Regulation No. 11/2008 about Information and Transactional Electronic (ITE).
Ringkasan Alternatif
Globalization era is marked by the growing of information and transactional media, and the Indonesian banking system has followed world globalization, as the idea of credit card is giving client a practical and efficient transactions. Adjacent to the positive impacts, one of the credit cardâÃâ¬Ãâ¢s negative impacts is credit card counterfeiting. In Indonesian positive law, credit card counterfeiting has being regulated by article 263 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) about making a fake letter and falsify a letter, so therefore a query on how article 263 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) and article 35 Regulation No. 11/2008 about Information and Transactional Electronic (ITE) regulate credit card counterfeiting and the legal action that could be done to the criminal.
This research is using an analytical description with normative juridical approach. The data has been qualitative juridical analyzed considering the hierarchy of the regulations itself and to achieve law certainness as the government execute the regulation actually.
Based on the result of this research, credit card counterfeiting has fulfilled the objective and subjective substances of article 263 subsection 1 and 2 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) about making a fake letter and falsify a letter as in article 35 Regulation No. 11/2008 about Information and Transactional Electronic (ITE), consequently the criminal of this counterfeiting could be accused by article 263 subsection 1 and 2 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) juncto article 35 Regulation No. 11/2008 about Information and Transactional Electronic (ITE). However, a preventive and repressive action should be done for all law-breaking acts including credit card counterfeiting. Preventive way of action could be taken in 3 approaches consist of technological, cultural social, and legal approach. Repressive action by law enforcements (police, public prosecutor, judge) is taken considering to article 263 subsection 1 and 2 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) juncto article 35 Regulation No. 11/2008 about Information and Transactional Electronic (ITE).
Sumber
Judul Serupa
- TINJAUAN HUKUM TENTANG PEMALSUAN TANDA TANGAN DIGITAL DALAM E-COMMERCE DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PASAL 263 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA JUNCTO PASAL 35 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK